Agents that say they don’t sit opens are in my opinion lazy…

Pin It

Open house signThat little gem of a title contains neither my words, nor my opinion. It’s a quote from one agents response to a question on Trulia Voices this morning.

The question came from a home seller in Glendale, AZ who was in the process of interviewing six agents to list their home (which I might add, is a very smart thing to do. Nothing is magical about the number 6, but both home buyers and sellers should interview more than one agent). “S.M.” said they were frustrated at how little work agents were offering to do while expecting a “full commission”.

S.M. said (in part):

They do not want to do open houses, broker open houses, company caravans, tour new listings, showcase or feature my home, advertise in local paper or other means, will not personally show my home (I have to deal with buyers agents to set up showing and leaving my property) or any other effective marketing tools a professional Realtor will utilize.

Several agents immediately chimed in. Some were local Phoenix real estate agents. Others hailed from opposite sides of the continent with the ubiquitous offers to “refer a qualified agent”. Many opinions were proffered.

Here is what I originally had to say regarding open houses:

Open houses rarely sell homes. They are great at finding the agent buyer clients, but the chances of someone buying your home through an open house are remote. You’re opening your home to total strangers, and hoping no one rifles your medicine cabinet or is staking out the goods to rip off later.

Shotgun marketing vs. laser focused

Many agents realize this. Others seem to believe in “shotgun marketing” — throw everything including the kitchen sink and open houses at in the dim hope that maybe a person serious about buying will be driving by, see your sign, and stumble into their dream home waiving an offer.

Heck, you might as well post flyers on all the palms trees on the corner. You never know when someone is going to be stopped at a red light, see your flyer and jot down the number so they know where to send the offer.

Our title quote came from a local agent who also had this to say:

I know you have probably been advised to use one of the bigger agents, there are pros and cons to that. The pro is that they get more leads, the cons is that you get less service. The bigger agents tend to list your home on MLS and that’s pretty much it.
_____

Yes opens rarely sell homes, and broker opens are mostly for agents to get together to network. Print ads have little efficiency. That does not mean that they should not be done.
_____

Another very important thing to look for in a listing agent is that this agent has showcase membership on Realtor.com. Realtor.com is the most important advertising channel there is. . .
_____

And of course my favorite: “The agents that say they don’t sit opens is in my opinion lazy and they use the excuse of “open houses does not sell a house”

My intent here is not to slam this agent. She is free to run her business as she sees fit, and use whatever marketing techniques she deems worthy. Oh, I’ll freely admit that I don’t appreciate, one iota, being called lazy by someone that has no idea how I run my business nor any clue about my work ethic. And much of the conversation in this thread reminded me of our current elections, complete with candidates/agents pandering, groveling and slinging mud at their opponents rather than focusing on what they have to bring to the table. That is pathetic, but not really the point here.

The point is, it is exceedingly rare for an open house to result in a sale of that home. Of course it happens. You could also try dropping leaflets from an airplane or sky writing too. Plaster your face on bus bench while you’re at it. All of these could in theory land a buyer.

I don’t have any empirical data to support just how rare it is, but there is certainly a boatload of anecdotal evidence that supports very few homes are sold at open houses. It’s quite possible that the number of people casing your home for future burglary (if not outright theft of your belongings AT the open house) outnumber the direct sales figures.

In my experience and in discussions with dozens of other agents, the overwhelming consensus is agents hold open houses for two major reasons: 1) to find buyer contacts and build their lead database; and 2) to appease their sellers.

I prefer to find buyer clients and build a prospect database sitting in my house, not dressed up and sitting in your home, tapping into your network while baking bread so the house smells good. I’m not terribly found of dragging A-frame open house signs across the neighborhood tying balloons to them and wondering if some punk is going to steal them. Open houses are a pain in the posterior for the sellers too, as to do it right, they need to clean the home. lock up or nail down anything that can be stolen and vacate the premises for hours, usually on a weekend. Why? So I can find some clients — for me.

Personally, I’d rather target my marketing efforts to find serious qualified buyers looking for the kind of home we are selling. Print ads, broker caravans and open houses don’t fit that model.

This doesn’t mean I’m better than the shotgun marketers. It doesn’t mean they “suck” or are inferior agents. It just means we are different. If you are a home seller and you want an open house, talk to us. The odds are overwhelming that we won’t hold an open, but there are always exceptions. Depending on the home, and more importantly certain location factors such as traffic flow, there may be some times where holding open houses makes sense. In every case, you will know up front exactly how we plan to market your home.

But unless you’re a licensed pilot, you can absolutely forget about the sky writing thing.

Photo credit

Like, Tweet, share...

Pin It

 

Other things you can do...

Search for Homes
Email Updates
RSS

About the Author
Jay Thompson

I'm a real estate broker in Phoenix, Arizona and the publisher of the Phoenix Real Estate Guy blog. I tend to drive too fast and scream at the University of Texas and Denver Broncos football teams. My two kids are smarter than most adults I know and my wife is simply amazing.

The Phoenix Real Estate Guy runs on AgentPress

AgentPress is a specialized WordPress theme for real estate agents and brokers, powered by the industry standard Genesis Framework. With AgentPress on your team, you're empowered to get the most out of WordPress for online marketing.

Genesis provides the secure and search-engine-optimized foundation that powers any successful website. And AgentPress provides the specific listing and lead-generation functionality real estate pros need to succeed.

Find out more about AgentPress here.

Comments

We always appreciate your comments! Phoenix Real Estate Guy uses two commenting systems, Facebook and LiveFyre. LiveFyre is the most robust system (and easy to use!). It allows you to login with Twitter, Facebook, Google+ LinkedIn, OpenId, LiveFyre and as a "Guest". I recommend getting a LiveFyre account, it has some great features (just click the LiveFyre button when you write your comment).

 

BLOG COMMENT POLICY: We respectfully ask that you use your real name (first name only is fine) and not use keywords (Why no keywords?). The only real "comment rules" are be civil -- no personal attacks -- and no advertising. (See the full comment policy here). Opinion and debate are welcome, but attack the idea, not the person.

 

LiveFyre Comments

Comments have been disabled for this post.
Sort: Newest | Oldest

You would not believe the number of people who have bought (off plan + buy to let) 2 or 3 apartments in a block on the basis of the artists impression, the promise of rental returns worked out 2 years ago and the experience of a TV programme from last year. I will go to private viewings, open house and sit outside at different times of the day, and advise everyone to do the same.

Open houses used serve an important function in the real estate buying process. Buyers didn't used to have the option of sitting at their computer and viewing hundreds of homes with multiple photos and virtual tours to start their home search, they had to find a good way to get into homes. This wasn't to purchase the home, it was to go out and learn what their money bought in each neighborhood. Now in a couple hours with access to a good IDX or VOW you can figure out what you money will buy you in just about any neighborhood out there.

BTW, this isn't just my opinion. Multiple buyers we have worked with over the past few years have commented about how different it is buying today then in the past. The above is just a summary of their opinions.

I remember the conversation on Trulia and had a similar response to it.

An agent's marketing efforts are clearly more effective and efficient when focused on the methods that work on a predictable and broader scale if the intent from those efforts is to actually sell the home. Agents continue to justify the open house because they are preserving a lead generation tool. Recently, I've found that even sellers are becoming much more savvy about the ineffectiveness of an open house.

Eight years ago - I did sell a house on an open. It was my very first listing - the first guy that walked in on my very first open house. Beginner's luck. :)

I'm always upfront with the sellers to let them know how effective they are, or aren't. If they still insist, then I bring all the things I didn't get to do during the week. After communicating the results, they typically understand better our first conversation and why they are not a good use of my time and their time spent driving around or planning activities to stay out of the house.

I personally dislike open houses. I like to do 1 or 2 for a listing only. After the 2nd open house the rest just seem a waist, the neighbors have all stopped by already, the vast majority of people who are going to visit a open have come buy, and so not much to do anymore.

After the first two open houses I do not like to have the home owner leave their home on a Sunday for 3 hours on the very unlikely chance that the right buyer for their home will just happen buy and want to look. This same buyer, if they are motivated enough to be writing a offer on said home is likely doing a fair amount of research online and is totally aware of the home.

When the market was totally hot back in 2004 I managed to sell 3 homes at the open house but a real estate market like that will likely not be back in this lifetime.

Jim

I believe NAR put out the statistic of .5% of Open Houses sell the home. I have never sold one. But I did get 2 listings and one also bought.

I am getting more and more clients relieved that I won't do more than 1 Open House typically. You have unqualified, random people walking through your home, especially in the Summer.

One person didn't want an Open because she didn't want her nosy neighbor to be inside.

I did have a couple of clients who held multiple Open Houses on Saturdays and Sundays for 4-5 hours. It didn't help.

There is one agent I know who is very good at converting the lookers into buyers. I do agree that most Open Houses are not marketed correctly but I also had 44 groups of people through one of my Open Houses. None were serious, just looking and there is no way I could keep track of all of them in the house.

Great topic. I have only had one open house that impacted a sale. I showed a property to a buyer that called me from an internet ad. I had scheduled this open house since there was a festival going on a few blocks away and many people would be parking on my seller's street. The buyer I had shown the house to came back with her boyfriend, then later again with her agent and then bought the house. I am confident that she would have bought it even if I hadn't held it open. She just would have brought the boyfriend back a different time. BTW, the foot traffic from the festival did nothing to gain us any interested parties.

I've never lost a listing due to my reluctance to hold them open. I tell sellers about the things I do plan to do to sell their house, and then I simply explain to my sellers that I have a limited number of hours in my week. If they would prefer I sit in their house for two hours on a Sunday rather than doing some of the other more effective things, then I'm willing to do it. But, I would much prefer to use my time on effective sales techniques. They always agree!

I do occassionally offer to hold an open house if we are still on the market after 60 days. I let the sellers know I don't think that it will work, but I'm willing to give it a try. Then, when no serious buyers show up, they can see that I'm willing to do what it takes to get their house sold, but there simply isn't a point of doing another one.

The only areas in my city that seem to be effective for open houses are areas that are very prestigious with limited supply. Sometimes you have people that have no intention of moving, but when they see a home that they love, will go ahead a make the move. Nosy neighbors can be effective in this case since they may just call a friend that might be interested. But, outside of these areas, I think that the few homes that sell through an open would probably still sell to these buyers...they would just call their agent, or the listing agent, to schedule a showing.

Jay, I am also one who thinks my strength is not converting open house contacts into leads. They do seem to be effective and some agents do a very nice buisness in holding multiple open houses each weekend.

Absolutely right on. Open Houses rarely sell the home that's being held Open. I'd say that at LEAST half the visitors to any Open House are neighbors just being nosy. In fact, many admit to it. Adding to the frustration, as pointed out above, are the visitors who are just window shopping for "decorating ideas", or curiousity. I actually have a relative that looks forward to weekends solely for the purpose of visiting Open Houses. He's not ever going to buy, he just likes going. Crazy...

I also have success of selling an Open to a buyer who visited my Open House, who asked me to sell her house so she could buy this house. Not bad, getting 3 sides out of it.

I absolutely agree with Jay about some being better at Open Houses than others, while others are better at Internet, or other forms of marketing. In my experience I've found 2 Realtors who are very good at converting Open Houses into sales: Dan and Leslie Lightfoot of Coldwell Banker. I'll see if I can get them to visit this blog and give some advice on what works at their Open Houses.

Jay, don't worry about the 150% number.

The house is probably overpriced by 50% which, I'm sure somehow, leaves you nice and balanced at 100% :)

RE/MAX preached the use of open houses all the time (at least the 2000 franchise did), but only so newer agents could build leads and get used to questions fielded by potential buyers and sellers.

As the ubiquity of the internet grows, hyper-locality becomes so key that random closings due to open houses will only grow smaller as time passes. As a buyer, I'll check the MLS search tool here, build my list of MLS numbers I'd like my agent to look into further, and let him also supplement it with ones I may have missed or ones that are on the fringes of my criteria.

Before either of us leave our air conditioned rooms, nearly all the research will have been done already. Open houses may be good for the "hmm, before we leave the neighborhood, let's check out this one" visit, but in Arizona, few folks are going to want to stop into tons of open houses unless they're those types of folks who love to shop for homes and see interiors without any true desire to purchase.

But perception is reality and there are old-school folks who stick to the traditional method. Good luck with them :)

Jay, this is one reason I stay away form Trulia Voices:) How is the consumer supposed to figure out from these conflicting responses if Open Houses is good marketing for their home. I've held many Open houses with few/no visitors; visitors who didn't want to leave their names, or contact info, etc. I had to escort them through the house to make sure my clients' property was protected. Didn't find it successful for my clients, or for me.

Jay.....Interesting post. I have been in the real estate business with Remax up here in Calgary Alberta Canada for just over 12 years now and I have sold a total of 1 listing through an open house. It would seem that this type of marketing tool is not the most effective of the bunch! I do however agree with the comment that some types of homes do need to have this happen. Homes that are "tucked away" on quiet streets and not apparent to the public can benefit from this process just from the exposure that the listing can gain from the open house signs out on the streets in the surrounding area. At the end of the day we as Agents are responsible for following the direction of our clients or vendors and if they are wanting to try this as an option after talking to their Agent about it we need to honour that process.

Jay,

This post hits home and is great because my brother and I like you don't do open houses and we explain to our sellers we would rather focus our efforts on the getting more leads through the medium we are best at(Internet). Has this cost a listing every now and then? Sure and they are the ones that also want me to write letters and call every day. I think it takes a better agent to admit what he or she is good at and what will work best for the seller not just appeasing the sellers wishes.

I would have to agree with some of the comments, however I have organized several open houses. Some good, some not so good. I have to agree with Reuben above that in a market where "demand outstrips supply", then perhaps open houses could be effective for the sellers benefit. I also agree with Chris, that buyers can and will buy from an open house but the percentage is extremely low.

My last open house and current listing on the market has a very interested buyer. They came through an open house that I was holding (which has fantastic traffic flow & exposure) and are very interested in writing an offer. They of course have a home to sell in another state. We have kept in touch and when they sell their home, we will revisit the idea of an offer. In my opinion, this is a very rare occurrence however not impossible. Perhaps I will have something to report back here soon!

I have to also disagree with Jonathan (sorry buddy), I don't agree that Phoenix is not a place for open houses. Effective marketing done correctly and creatively can be very instrumental in selling your clients house. However, an open house might not be effective for all homes on the market per Jay's suggestions above. IMO, I'm still not convinced they are something that should be ruled out.

Making your clients aware of your entire marketing plan (including no open houses) in advance and in writing would alleviate any misunderstandings. It is also the agents responsibility to educate the seller/s of the unlikelihood of an offer coming from a direct open house.

I think homeowners today want the truth and not some over zealous agent blowing smoke.

Rebecca wrote: "Jay - Is it possible that in certain areas of the country open houses could be more effective than others. "

I think so, absolutely. "Real estate is local" means not just for buyers and sellers and 'the market', but also for how real estate is marketed and transacted.

Thanks all for the great discussion! Every single one of you made valid points, and it's interesting (at least for me) to see some actual numbers put to this. My personal batting average on selling the home from an open is .000 -- and that may well be because I stink at "converting" open house traffic. Some people are good at converting desk phone calls, some are good at converting internet leads, so why shouldn't there be some good at converting open house leads? But still it seems the overwhelming majority of agents I speak with are along the, "Great for getting buyers, lousy for selling the actual home" route.

@Reuben - your numbers are interesting. I want price and other internet to be higher. Problem is, I can't think of which one to reduce. Every time I run the numbers I wind up at 150%....

I've been involved in over 100 transactions, and I've had 2 instances where the listing was sold because of an open house.

Once I had a buyer stroll into my open house (my listing), and later that week we wrote a contract.

Once I was out with buyers, and they asked to stop at an open house that wasn't on our list of homes to see. Turns out it was smaller than their minimum, but the liked the neighborhood and something about this home struck them. An hour later I had my laptop open and we were writing an offer.

So you can't tell me that open houses, even in Phoenix, don't sell homes. (you can, however, tell me the percentages aren't in our favor!)

That said, the only reason I would do an open house is to introduce myself to the neighbors, and maybe to pick up a buyer. ;-)

I have long held the theory that open houses are only effective when and where demand outstrips supply. True for my market anyway.

As for the shotgun approach, let's not ask what we could be doing (it would never end). Rather, let's ask, what, in fact, gets the house sold? My rough take:

Correct Pricing: 50%

MLS: 25%

Other Internet: 10%

Yard Sign: 10%

EVERYTHING ELSE: 5%

I would be extremely interested in other opinions. Thanks!

Tough one, I do personally think opens help, neighbors may stop by and know someone a friend or family member looking it just gets additional exposure that wouldn’t be gotten otherwise. However is it going to "sell" the home more then likely not directly.

On another issue I do think most agents don’t do a full job or as much as they could to get homes sold. Now those same agents are the ones that are out of the real estate business within 2 years. SO they kind of weed themselves out by not doing enough to get homes sold/ impress clients which what they do/ knowledge they posses.

There is so much business and money to be made by the agents who just do a great job with every client and advertise properly. You’re not going to please everyone but the key is going a great job. Some people regardless of what or how you do a great job just won’t accept your work as being worth 3% of their home…. But again they don’t realize that someone that is handling literally millions of dollars worth of people assets a year is going to be well paid, its just the way it works. Some sellers just can see what their 10k (or whatever the listing agents commission is) could buy with it and it pisses them off. But what they can’t see is that, that particular listing agent is in charge of 300k of their money it’s just to big of a number for them to comprehend.

Jay, the number that I've heard (though its been a while ago & I don't remember where it came from) is that less than 1/2 of 1% of homes acutally sell as the result of an open house.

Don't get me wrong, we do them perodically because sometimes I think it's good for the neighbors & public at large to physically "see" us working. Having 12 signs plastered around a neighborhood where we do quite a bit of business is well...good for business. However, adding to the sellers false sense of hope regarding the sale of their home at an open house isn't doing any good either.

Enjoy your Saturday out of your "Realtor costume" & out of the heat!

Open houses might be effective elsewhere ... just not in Phoenix, despite what this one particular agent was arguing (and quite personally, I might add.) Maybe that time is spent online looking up grammar lessons, I don't know.

There's a reason almost every broker tells his or her new agents to go sit open houses ... to pick up buyers. Same reason buyers agents end up working open houses ... has almost nothing to do with the house itself.

Jay,

The only seller benefit that I have found for an open house is to make it available to an agent's client who can't show the home any other time. These are rare occurances. When an agent is busy (or out of town) and can't physically show the home during the week, an open house allows that agent to send his/her client to the open house. The client can then take their time and view it without having the seller present.

However, the reality is that homes don't sell because the agent holds an open house.

Jay,

Is it possible that in certain areas of the country open houses could be more effective than others. I have heard both sides of the fence on the open house issue.

Really the only benefit of doing an open house is the hopes of finding some other clients to sell another house to...They are great for that! But for actually selling a house, they do absolutely nothing. One of the problems I think though is so very few agents understand HOW to have a good open house. They don't market the open house, they don't send invitations, they pretty much sit there with the hopes of someone seeing a sign and driving by...

Jay, I couldn't agree with you more. Open Houses have been proven to be the means of showing "action" for many agents who have no other means to show it. Unfortunately seller's believe these methods are performed for results to benefit them and them alone. So not true. It's more like having a cool little fishing pond where you invite the neighbors in to fish. They come in sit for a few hours and go home with all your fish.

You would not believe the number of people who have bought (off plan + buy to let) 2 or 3 apartments in a block on the basis of the artists impression, the promise of rental returns worked out 2 years ago and the experience of a TV programme from last year. I will go to private viewings, open house and sit outside at different times of the day, and advise everyone to do the same.

Open houses used serve an important function in the real estate buying process. Buyers didn't used to have the option of sitting at their computer and viewing hundreds of homes with multiple photos and virtual tours to start their home search, they had to find a good way to get into homes. This wasn't to purchase the home, it was to go out and learn what their money bought in each neighborhood. Now in a couple hours with access to a good IDX or VOW you can figure out what you money will buy you in just about any neighborhood out there.

BTW, this isn't just my opinion. Multiple buyers we have worked with over the past few years have commented about how different it is buying today then in the past. The above is just a summary of their opinions.

I remember the conversation on Trulia and had a similar response to it.

An agent's marketing efforts are clearly more effective and efficient when focused on the methods that work on a predictable and broader scale if the intent from those efforts is to actually sell the home. Agents continue to justify the open house because they are preserving a lead generation tool. Recently, I've found that even sellers are becoming much more savvy about the ineffectiveness of an open house.

Eight years ago - I did sell a house on an open. It was my very first listing - the first guy that walked in on my very first open house. Beginner's luck. :)

I'm always upfront with the sellers to let them know how effective they are, or aren't. If they still insist, then I bring all the things I didn't get to do during the week. After communicating the results, they typically understand better our first conversation and why they are not a good use of my time and their time spent driving around or planning activities to stay out of the house.

It is important to help the seller best understand the marketing strategies. The problem is not the seller but the real estate agents. They should take the time to layout an effective marketing plan instead of just say they are not going to do an open house. The seller has formed his reasoning to that is what you are supposed to do. It does not matter if they are effective or not. It is vital to help the seller understand what is vital like a doctor should with a patient.

I personally dislike open houses. I like to do 1 or 2 for a listing only. After the 2nd open house the rest just seem a waist, the neighbors have all stopped by already, the vast majority of people who are going to visit a open have come buy, and so not much to do anymore.

After the first two open houses I do not like to have the home owner leave their home on a Sunday for 3 hours on the very unlikely chance that the right buyer for their home will just happen buy and want to look. This same buyer, if they are motivated enough to be writing a offer on said home is likely doing a fair amount of research online and is totally aware of the home.

When the market was totally hot back in 2004 I managed to sell 3 homes at the open house but a real estate market like that will likely not be back in this lifetime.

Jim

Hmm.. This is a tough one. We did new home sales and the direct traffic into the sales office was a direct correlation with what type of ads / advertising we had going on. We were also trained a little differently in converting walk ins into buyers... and not just being order takers. In other words... you know the house inside and out.

I think a big part of open houses, like anything else, is how you do them. More often then not (from what I see) 95% of them are done wrong to begin with so it's kind of tough to have decent numbers selling them in the first place. Put a sign or two out, sit around and pray, etc...

Watch the Trademark group (they swear by them) after they rehab a home and see how they turn it into an event. It is over the top but borrow the techniques... and this means the homeowners having that home professionally staged before even starting it up.

I certainly don't think you should select a real estate agent just because they are going to do an open house -- or even a brokers caravan, etc.. since statistically, these are going to have the lowest success ratios in actually selling the home but once again... we go back to how many of them are just... well... open houses.

If this particular person really wants to select an agent that is going to do open houses, the key part is selecting the real estate agent that knows how to do them -- and straight out ask them what they are going to do for the open house.

"They do not want to do open houses, broker open houses, company caravans, tour new listings, showcase or feature my home, advertise in local paper or other means, will not personally show my home (I have to deal with buyers agents to set up showing and leaving my property) or any other effective marketing tools a professional Realtor will utilize."

Just because they find a real estate agent that does all of the above... does not mean it will sell a home. It's how they do it.

I believe NAR put out the statistic of .5% of Open Houses sell the home. I have never sold one. But I did get 2 listings and one also bought.

I am getting more and more clients relieved that I won't do more than 1 Open House typically. You have unqualified, random people walking through your home, especially in the Summer.

One person didn't want an Open because she didn't want her nosy neighbor to be inside.

I did have a couple of clients who held multiple Open Houses on Saturdays and Sundays for 4-5 hours. It didn't help.

There is one agent I know who is very good at converting the lookers into buyers. I do agree that most Open Houses are not marketed correctly but I also had 44 groups of people through one of my Open Houses. None were serious, just looking and there is no way I could keep track of all of them in the house.

Great topic. I have only had one open house that impacted a sale. I showed a property to a buyer that called me from an internet ad. I had scheduled this open house since there was a festival going on a few blocks away and many people would be parking on my seller's street. The buyer I had shown the house to came back with her boyfriend, then later again with her agent and then bought the house. I am confident that she would have bought it even if I hadn't held it open. She just would have brought the boyfriend back a different time. BTW, the foot traffic from the festival did nothing to gain us any interested parties.

I've never lost a listing due to my reluctance to hold them open. I tell sellers about the things I do plan to do to sell their house, and then I simply explain to my sellers that I have a limited number of hours in my week. If they would prefer I sit in their house for two hours on a Sunday rather than doing some of the other more effective things, then I'm willing to do it. But, I would much prefer to use my time on effective sales techniques. They always agree!

I do occassionally offer to hold an open house if we are still on the market after 60 days. I let the sellers know I don't think that it will work, but I'm willing to give it a try. Then, when no serious buyers show up, they can see that I'm willing to do what it takes to get their house sold, but there simply isn't a point of doing another one.

The only areas in my city that seem to be effective for open houses are areas that are very prestigious with limited supply. Sometimes you have people that have no intention of moving, but when they see a home that they love, will go ahead a make the move. Nosy neighbors can be effective in this case since they may just call a friend that might be interested. But, outside of these areas, I think that the few homes that sell through an open would probably still sell to these buyers...they would just call their agent, or the listing agent, to schedule a showing.

Jay, I am also one who thinks my strength is not converting open house contacts into leads. They do seem to be effective and some agents do a very nice buisness in holding multiple open houses each weekend.

Absolutely right on. Open Houses rarely sell the home that's being held Open. I'd say that at LEAST half the visitors to any Open House are neighbors just being nosy. In fact, many admit to it. Adding to the frustration, as pointed out above, are the visitors who are just window shopping for "decorating ideas", or curiousity. I actually have a relative that looks forward to weekends solely for the purpose of visiting Open Houses. He's not ever going to buy, he just likes going. Crazy...

I also have success of selling an Open to a buyer who visited my Open House, who asked me to sell her house so she could buy this house. Not bad, getting 3 sides out of it.

I absolutely agree with Jay about some being better at Open Houses than others, while others are better at Internet, or other forms of marketing. In my experience I've found 2 Realtors who are very good at converting Open Houses into sales: Dan and Leslie Lightfoot of Coldwell Banker. I'll see if I can get them to visit this blog and give some advice on what works at their Open Houses.

Jay, I was happy to see you clarified that title in the first paragraph. As you mentioned there are much more productive things to do than sit an open house. I rarely do them, like once or twice a year but I got talked into one this coming Sunday... I will be showing them this blog post. ;)

Jay, don't worry about the 150% number.

The house is probably overpriced by 50% which, I'm sure somehow, leaves you nice and balanced at 100% :)

RE/MAX preached the use of open houses all the time (at least the 2000 franchise did), but only so newer agents could build leads and get used to questions fielded by potential buyers and sellers.

As the ubiquity of the internet grows, hyper-locality becomes so key that random closings due to open houses will only grow smaller as time passes. As a buyer, I'll check the MLS search tool here, build my list of MLS numbers I'd like my agent to look into further, and let him also supplement it with ones I may have missed or ones that are on the fringes of my criteria.

Before either of us leave our air conditioned rooms, nearly all the research will have been done already. Open houses may be good for the "hmm, before we leave the neighborhood, let's check out this one" visit, but in Arizona, few folks are going to want to stop into tons of open houses unless they're those types of folks who love to shop for homes and see interiors without any true desire to purchase.

But perception is reality and there are old-school folks who stick to the traditional method. Good luck with them :)

Jay, this is one reason I stay away form Trulia Voices:) How is the consumer supposed to figure out from these conflicting responses if Open Houses is good marketing for their home. I've held many Open houses with few/no visitors; visitors who didn't want to leave their names, or contact info, etc. I had to escort them through the house to make sure my clients' property was protected. Didn't find it successful for my clients, or for me.

Open Houses are a lot of work for the seller, with little chance of a sale. SOmetimes it looks desparate, especially if everything but the kitchen sink is thrown at a property in one day. Another downside; I know someone who sees open houses as a trip out and a chance to be nosey. Lets organise viewings with serious buyers

I am not real estate pro, but anytime an agent does not want to do the "dirty work"... I agree... its just laziness. EXCELLENT post.

Jay.....Interesting post. I have been in the real estate business with Remax up here in Calgary Alberta Canada for just over 12 years now and I have sold a total of 1 listing through an open house. It would seem that this type of marketing tool is not the most effective of the bunch! I do however agree with the comment that some types of homes do need to have this happen. Homes that are "tucked away" on quiet streets and not apparent to the public can benefit from this process just from the exposure that the listing can gain from the open house signs out on the streets in the surrounding area. At the end of the day we as Agents are responsible for following the direction of our clients or vendors and if they are wanting to try this as an option after talking to their Agent about it we need to honour that process.

Jay,

This post hits home and is great because my brother and I like you don't do open houses and we explain to our sellers we would rather focus our efforts on the getting more leads through the medium we are best at(Internet). Has this cost a listing every now and then? Sure and they are the ones that also want me to write letters and call every day. I think it takes a better agent to admit what he or she is good at and what will work best for the seller not just appeasing the sellers wishes.

I would have to agree with some of the comments, however I have organized several open houses. Some good, some not so good. I have to agree with Reuben above that in a market where "demand outstrips supply", then perhaps open houses could be effective for the sellers benefit. I also agree with Chris, that buyers can and will buy from an open house but the percentage is extremely low.

My last open house and current listing on the market has a very interested buyer. They came through an open house that I was holding (which has fantastic traffic flow & exposure) and are very interested in writing an offer. They of course have a home to sell in another state. We have kept in touch and when they sell their home, we will revisit the idea of an offer. In my opinion, this is a very rare occurrence however not impossible. Perhaps I will have something to report back here soon!

I have to also disagree with Jonathan (sorry buddy), I don't agree that Phoenix is not a place for open houses. Effective marketing done correctly and creatively can be very instrumental in selling your clients house. However, an open house might not be effective for all homes on the market per Jay's suggestions above. IMO, I'm still not convinced they are something that should be ruled out.

Making your clients aware of your entire marketing plan (including no open houses) in advance and in writing would alleviate any misunderstandings. It is also the agents responsibility to educate the seller/s of the unlikelihood of an offer coming from a direct open house.

I think homeowners today want the truth and not some over zealous agent blowing smoke.

Rebecca wrote: "Jay - Is it possible that in certain areas of the country open houses could be more effective than others. "

I think so, absolutely. "Real estate is local" means not just for buyers and sellers and 'the market', but also for how real estate is marketed and transacted.

Thanks all for the great discussion! Every single one of you made valid points, and it's interesting (at least for me) to see some actual numbers put to this. My personal batting average on selling the home from an open is .000 -- and that may well be because I stink at "converting" open house traffic. Some people are good at converting desk phone calls, some are good at converting internet leads, so why shouldn't there be some good at converting open house leads? But still it seems the overwhelming majority of agents I speak with are along the, "Great for getting buyers, lousy for selling the actual home" route.

@Reuben - your numbers are interesting. I want price and other internet to be higher. Problem is, I can't think of which one to reduce. Every time I run the numbers I wind up at 150%....

I've been involved in over 100 transactions, and I've had 2 instances where the listing was sold because of an open house.

Once I had a buyer stroll into my open house (my listing), and later that week we wrote a contract.

Once I was out with buyers, and they asked to stop at an open house that wasn't on our list of homes to see. Turns out it was smaller than their minimum, but the liked the neighborhood and something about this home struck them. An hour later I had my laptop open and we were writing an offer.

So you can't tell me that open houses, even in Phoenix, don't sell homes. (you can, however, tell me the percentages aren't in our favor!)

That said, the only reason I would do an open house is to introduce myself to the neighbors, and maybe to pick up a buyer. ;-)

I have long held the theory that open houses are only effective when and where demand outstrips supply. True for my market anyway.

As for the shotgun approach, let's not ask what we could be doing (it would never end). Rather, let's ask, what, in fact, gets the house sold? My rough take:

Correct Pricing: 50%

MLS: 25%

Other Internet: 10%

Yard Sign: 10%

EVERYTHING ELSE: 5%

I would be extremely interested in other opinions. Thanks!

Tough one, I do personally think opens help, neighbors may stop by and know someone a friend or family member looking it just gets additional exposure that wouldnu00e2u0080u0099t be gotten otherwise. However is it going to "sell" the home more then likely not directly.

On another issue I do think most agents donu00e2u0080u0099t do a full job or as much as they could to get homes sold. Now those same agents are the ones that are out of the real estate business within 2 years. SO they kind of weed themselves out by not doing enough to get homes sold/ impress clients which what they do/ knowledge they posses.

There is so much business and money to be made by the agents who just do a great job with every client and advertise properly. Youu00e2u0080u0099re not going to please everyone but the key is going a great job. Some people regardless of what or how you do a great job just wonu00e2u0080u0099t accept your work as being worth 3% of their homeu00e2u0080u00a6. But again they donu00e2u0080u0099t realize that someone that is handling literally millions of dollars worth of people assets a year is going to be well paid, its just the way it works. Some sellers just can see what their 10k (or whatever the listing agents commission is) could buy with it and it pisses them off. But what they canu00e2u0080u0099t see is that, that particular listing agent is in charge of 300k of their money itu00e2u0080u0099s just to big of a number for them to comprehend.

Jay, the number that I've heard (though its been a while ago & I don't remember where it came from) is that less than 1/2 of 1% of homes acutally sell as the result of an open house.

Don't get me wrong, we do them perodically because sometimes I think it's good for the neighbors & public at large to physically "see" us working. Having 12 signs plastered around a neighborhood where we do quite a bit of business is well...good for business. However, adding to the sellers false sense of hope regarding the sale of their home at an open house isn't doing any good either.

Enjoy your Saturday out of your "Realtor costume" & out of the heat!

Open houses might be effective elsewhere ... just not in Phoenix, despite what this one particular agent was arguing (and quite personally, I might add.) Maybe that time is spent online looking up grammar lessons, I don't know.

There's a reason almost every broker tells his or her new agents to go sit open houses ... to pick up buyers. Same reason buyers agents end up working open houses ... has almost nothing to do with the house itself.

Jay,

The only seller benefit that I have found for an open house is to make it available to an agent's client who can't show the home any other time. These are rare occurances. When an agent is busy (or out of town) and can't physically show the home during the week, an open house allows that agent to send his/her client to the open house. The client can then take their time and view it without having the seller present.

However, the reality is that homes don't sell because the agent holds an open house.

Facebook Comments

 

The ARMLS logo indicates a property listed by a real estate brokerage other than Thompson's Realty.
All information should be verified by the recipient and none is guaranteed as accurate by ARMLS.

Copyright 2012 Arizona Regional Multiple Listing Service, Inc. All rights reserved.

Data last updated 2/9/12 10:35 AM PST.

This IDX solution is (c) Diverse Solutions 2012.