Drunk Driver that Killed Kelly Tracy Pleads Guilty. Prison Sentence is. . .

by Jay Thompson on October 10, 2009 · Comments

in Life, Phoenix News & Events

kelly-and-matt-small . . . ridiculous. Beyond my comprehension.

Kelly Tracy was 16 years old when Manuel Contreras-Galdean got behind the wheel of a car at 6:30 in the morning with a blood-alcohol level over twice the legal limit.

He murdered an amazingly talented, bright and caring young lady. He brought unimaginable pain and suffering to hundreds of Kelly’s friends. Very few can even remotely comprehend the suffering he inflicted on Kelly’s family.

Kelly was a member of my daughter’s High School marching band. My wife and I were volunteers with the band the morning Kelly was killed and we were present in the room when her band mates were informed of her tragic death.

Almost a year later I still can’t think of that day without crying.

Yesterday the Arizona Republic reported that Contreras-Galdean pleaded guilty to one count each of manslaughter and aggravated assault for his actions that day. A Maricopa County Attorney’s Office spokesman said he will face a 10½ year prison sentence for each count.

And he will serve those sentences concurrently.

In other words, he serves his two sentences together, as opposed to consecutively (or “back-to-back”) as had been previously discussed.

In other words, Manuel Contreras-Galdean will spend only 10½ years in prison for killing Kelly and hurting her brother.

10½ years.

For killing a 16 year old. A completely preventable tragedy. He chose to get drunk that morning. He knew the consequences (this was his third or fourth arrest for DUI). He gambled with Kelly’s life and she lost.

And he gets 10½ years.

Assuming he serves the full sentence, he’ll walk out of prison when he’s 42 years old. On that date, Kelly would have been 26. Twenty-six.

He will have another 40 or so years of freedom to enjoy when he gets out.

Kelly’s friends and family will only have memories. And thoughts of what could have been. And they’ll go through agony every November 15th, the anniversary of Kelly’s senseless and tragic death.

10½ years? That’s the value our society places on a human life?

In a post I wrote the day after Kelly died I said, “If he gets out of prison before he dies then a travesty of justice will have been served. I know I should be able to forgive him, but I can not. I’ll leave that to a higher and greater power.”

Well, a travesty of justice has been served. This “man” should rot in prison.

But he’ll be out in 10½ years.

Assuming of course he doesn’t get early release or time credited for “good behavior”.

10½ years.

It makes me physically ill.

Rest in peace Kelly. You accomplished more in your short life than the animal that killed you could ever dream of doing. Your smile will shine on forever.

 

.


 

Email This Post Email This Post Print This Post Print This Post

 


 

Thanks for reading! We value your thoughts and opinions, so please feel free to leave a comment. Please contact us if you have any questions or need help. You can also get automatic updates for this blog free via: Potentially Related Posts on Phoenix Real Estate Guy:
An Open Letter to Manuel Contreras-Galdean
With Memories of a Friend in their Heart, the Highland High School Marching Band Wins a State Championship
Reflections: In Memory of Kelly Tracy

 





Read this blog's Comment Policy
  • The problem is our system treats death by drunk driving as an accident. If a person gets behind the wheel of a car, drives drunk, and kills someone it should automatically be considered intentional
    homicide and be subject to the same penalties as shooting someone point blank without provocation. Obviously Kelly did nothing whatsoever to provoke being killed and Manuel did nothing to prevent using his car as a lethal weapon so how is what he did to her anything
    different than 1st degree murder? Our laws need to change dramatically so we stop making excuses for drunk drivers who kill.
  • Hey Jay
    This is something that most people would agree with you.
    It is a tragic that should be prevented by more severe consequences. In Canada for example you IMMEDIATELY lose your license once charged, it is a criminal record FELONY (if you try to travel to Canada from the US you will be denied entry because you are a felon) and the lifetime cost in Canada of a DUI is 50-60K. In America you just get a lawyer to beat the system if you have about 5-10K, you don't immediately lose your license and even if you are found guilty the cost is about 10-15K with no lifetime record.
    This I believe is unfair because when you drive drunk you are not only playing with your own life you are putting other innocent people in danger.
    My philosophy in life is as long as you are not posing any danger to society you should be allowed to do whatever you want as you already can in America. However the moment you are posing harm there should be more severe consequences.
  • Jolenta, Matt - agreed with both of you. . .
  • I agree here with the point that our law needs a serious amendment. We cannot ignore the drunk drivers who are killing people brutally and getting negligible punishments.
  • A very sad story. A repeat DUI offender indicates a complete disregard for the public's safety.
  • I agree, this is a bit crazy. Everybody deserves a second chance especially if it was because he was drunk :s
  • I agree, this is a bit crazy. Everybody deserves a second chance especially if it was because he was drunk :s

    (sorry first comment was an error)
  • drive high on marijuana not drunk...
  • We are so sorry for your loss - it did not have to be that way- these men and women driving drunk need long term treatment. http://www.soberliving.com
  • nickomcbrain
    Even there are number of ways to prevent drunk n' driving. They find new ways to over come this issue. If only the punishment are stronger the possibilities will decrease. Really a sad story.
blog comments powered by Disqus

Previous post: We Suck Less?

Next post: The Streets of Phoenix: Circle G Ranches