Home Buyer Tax Credit Information

by Jay Thompson on February 14, 2009 · 44 comments
Written by: Jay Thompson

in Home Buyer Tax Credit, National News, Real Estate

Those reading here over the past week know we’ve been obsessing over the about-to-become-law tax credit for first time home buyers. Several iterations were bantered about Congress before the dust finally settled.

Yesterday both the House and Senate passed the stimulus package (officially now called the “American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009”)  that included revisions to an existing first time home buyers tax credit. Courtesy of the National Association of Realtors (NAR), here is a nice breakdown comparing the two. The stimulus bill is expected to be signed into law by the President early next week.

FIRST-TIME HOMEBUYER TAX CREDIT
As Modified in the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act
Major Modifications Bolded
February 2009

FEATURECREDIT AS CREATED JULY 2008 APPLIES TO ALL QUALIFIED PURCHASES ON OR AFTER APRIL 9, 2008REVISED CREDIT – EFFECTIVE FOR PURCHASES ON OR AFTER JANUARY 1, 2009 AND BEFORE DECEMBER 1, 2009
Amount of CreditLesser of 10 percent of cost of home or $7500Maximum credit amount increased to $8000
Eligible PropertyAny single family residence (including condos, co-ops, townhouses) that will be used as a principal residence.

No change
All principal residences eligible.

RefundableYes. Reduces (or can eliminate) income tax liability for the year of purchase. Any unused amount of tax credit refunded to purchaser.

No change
Purchasers will continue to receive refund for unused amount when tax return is filed.

Income LimitYes. Full amount of credit available for individuals with adjusted gross income of no more than $75,000 ($150,000 on a joint return). Phases out above those caps ($95,000 and $170,000).

No change
Same income limits continue to apply.

First-time Homebuyer OnlyYes. Purchaser (and purchaser’s spouse) may not have owned a principal residence in 3 years previous to purchase.

No change
Still available for first-time purchasers only. Three-year rule continues to apply.

Revenue Bond FinancingNo credit allowed if home financed with state/local bond funding.Purchasers who utilize revenue bond financing can use credit.
RepaymentYes. Portion (6.67% of credit or $500) to be repaid each year for 15 years, starting with 2010 tax filing.No repayment for purchases on or after January 1, 2009 and before December 1, 2009
RecaptureIf home sold before 15-year repayment period ends, then outstanding balance of repayment amount recaptured on sale.If home is sold within three years of purchase, entire amount of credit is recaptured on sale. Applies only to homes purchased in 2009.
Termination

July 1, 2009
(But note program changes for 2009)

December 1, 2009
Effective DatePurchases on or after April 9, 2008 and before January 1, 2009. Repayment to begin for 2010 tax year.All revisions are effective as of January 1, 2009

You can download a PDF version of this home buyer tax credit comparison here.

There were a few other measures in the bill that could impact the housing market, most notably the reinstatement of higher FHA, Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae loans for 2009 (which look like they will be $356,250 for FHA and $417,000 for Fannie and Freddie in Maricopa and Pinal counties). There is also a tax credit for homeowners for purchases of qualified new furnaces, windows and insulation.  More on this as it becomes available.

Will this revised tax credit stimulate a housing market recovery? Maybe. Maybe not. Personally, I think the Senate’s version which was a $15,000 tax credit (that could be evenly split over two years), wasn’t subject to income restrictions and most importantly was for ALL, not just first-time, buyers would have been more successful. But that’s water under the bridge. It’s gone. What we have is what we have. This is a nice incentive for first-time buyers, and the fact that it is both refundable and does not have to be repaid is a significant improvement over the existing “credit” (which was really a zero interest loan).

I think it will help, but it’s certainly not a cure for the beleaguered real estate market. 

Of Note: I am not a tax professional, nor do I play one on TV or the Internet. You should seek advice from a CPA or professional tax preparer. If the IRS comes after you with guns blazing for anything you read in this post or anything you think you read in this post, it’s not my fault. Seek professional help!


 

Email This Post Email This Post Print This Post Print This Post

 

Phoenix Homes Search

 



Previous post: [ Spring has Arrived in Phoenix! ]
Next post: [ Obama to Visit Phoenix, Chatting up Foreclosure Fix ]

 


Thanks for reading! We value your thoughts and opinions, so please feel free to leave a comment. Please contact us if you have any questions or need help. You can also get automatic updates for this blog free via:
pagely468x60_1

{ 5 trackbacks }

$8,000 Home Buyers Tax Credit: What We Currently Know — The Phoenix Real Estate Guy
February 14, 2009 at 6:11 pm
$7500 Tax Credit For First Time Home Buyers
February 15, 2009 at 9:27 pm
Homebuyer Tax Credit Info
February 17, 2009 at 4:20 am
California Home Buyer Tax Credit Signed in to Law
February 21, 2009 at 11:59 pm
California Home Buyer Tax Credit Signed in to Law « FHAloanagent’s Blog
February 23, 2009 at 5:33 pm

{ 39 comments… read them below or add one }

1 Andy February 14, 2009 at 1:51 pm

Any idea as to whether or not this can be claimed on the 2008 tax return? The way I read the bill it appears that purchases can be treated as made on 12/31/2008 even if the actual purchase was made in 2009. Please let me know if I am reading this correctly. Thanks!

Reply to this comment

2 Jay - The Phoenix Real Estate Guy February 14, 2009 at 1:55 pm

Andy – that’s the way I read it too (that it can be claimed on 2008 return). But I’m not a tax professional and I’d consult with one first.

Reply to this comment

3 Michael February 14, 2009 at 3:09 pm

I’m irritated (as a potential 2009 buyer) that the govt. dangled the proverbial $15k carrot under my nose! Granted I have to sell one of my homes before I can put a contract on the dream home Francy showed us last weekend…

Fun fact from the “stimulus” bill getting press – they’ve “earmarked” $$ for a high speed rail from Anaheim to Vegas – some $33B – that’s BILLION. Reid really wants to take care of his constituency there I guess. I can just see the advertising now – “Ride for 86 minutes and no one will even know what you did in Vegas, let alone letting it stay in Vegas”. Ok so I’m not an advertising guru…you get the point. :)

Reply to this comment

4 Andy February 14, 2009 at 3:18 pm

Thanks for the response Jay. For those who are curious about what they would get back under this credit, check out IRS form 5405 (www.irs.gov), it is the current form used for the $7500 tax credit. I am assuming that the same calculation would be used for the $8000 tax credit. It is helpful especially for those of us who are over the income limits.

Here is an example using that calculation method for filing single ($75000 – $95000 income limit):
Adjusted gross income = $77500
$77500 – $75000 = $2500
$2500 / $20000 = 0.125
0.125 x $8000 = $1000
$8000 – $1000 = $7000 (the final credit amount)

Reply to this comment

5 Atlantanomics February 14, 2009 at 10:40 pm

Hey Jay, thanks for the information. Does anyone know how this is going to have to be filled out on a tax return? Will it be as simple as, lets say, checking a box “I bought my first home this year” or will it involve many complex forms? It seems to me that if it is the later, some people who this is targeted for, such as young people who do not have a lot of experience with filling out tax forms, might miss out on the incentive just from not knowing what to do. Just my $0.02.

**Atlantanomics´s last blog post..What do I think?

Reply to this comment

6 Sam@Search Austin Homes February 15, 2009 at 2:17 pm

I’ve got people sitting on the fence about buying now and the tax credit did nothing to get any of them moving. My biggest fear is a return to a Carter-era interest rate run-up when we need to pay for this pork package.

Reply to this comment

7 Dan February 15, 2009 at 4:53 pm

You know, I wonder if the best thing for the economy would be to simply leave it alone and let nature take its course. Has a big spending bill ever invigorated a languishing economy? There’s disagreement over Roosevelt’s New Deal, but I think a lot of economists would say the War boosted the economy in that instance, and not any government plan.

I also don’t side with Republicans, though, who think tax cuts are the holy grail. I can’t imagine having a $1,000 tax credit — or even an $8,000 one — is going to encourage me to run out and buy a flat-screen TV.

I hate to sound cynical, but I believe that the best thing government ever does is nothing. That’s what I’d like them to do in this situation.

Reply to this comment

8 Andy-Ann Arbor real estate February 15, 2009 at 7:00 pm

Nice summary of this program. I noticed that there are some people that think the 15,000 credit will get proposed again. It may not be completely dead. I think you are right about this program being a better stimulus. Right now in the Ann Arbor marked, first time buyers really are facing a great opportunity and the tax credit makes it even better. But, the 15k credit could loosen up a lot of move up or move down buyers too – this needs to happen to get the inventory up and the market balanced

Reply to this comment

9 Elaine Reese February 15, 2009 at 7:58 pm

I held an open house this afternoon on a $300K home. I had two 1st time buyer couples stop by. One was aware of the $8K credit. The other couple wasn’t but became excited when we discussed it. I told them to talk to their accountant, but depending on their financials, they might be able to lower their withholding, giving them more spending money during the rest of the year.

I was leery of the bill being enough to do any good, but after seeing these couples’ reactions, I’m a little more encouraged now.

**Elaine Reese´s last blog post..Congress – Stimulus Bill – Doxies. What do they have in common?

Reply to this comment

10 Dave in Phoenix February 15, 2009 at 8:57 pm

Does this incentive have the requirement for 5% down as one of the proposals for the bill mentioned a while ago? I’m looking at buying with a 3.5% down (FHA) and I need to look for a less expensive house then. Also, any links for the wording of the bill as it relates to the home buyer incentive?

Thanks, Dave

Reply to this comment

11 Hawaii real estate guy February 15, 2009 at 9:24 pm

I honestly do not think this new bill is going to stimulate much at all. It is too bad that so much money is being wasted and the tax payers are not getting much in return for it.

There is one simple thing these politicians could do to stop the real estate free fall, stabilize the market and also stimulate the economy.

Get rid of the capitol gains tax (for any one that bought real estate in the next 18 months if not for ever).

A lot of investors have their money liquid because of the stock market. They would quickly start buying up real estate knowing they would not have to pay capitol gains tax when they eventually sold the property. That would definitely stabilize the real estate market. It would also bring jobs back to all the real estate industry plus all the following:
Contractors and all their suppliers including appliances, paint, landscapers and all building supply companies.

I guess that would be too simple and not be helping lobbyist that put them into power.

Reply to this comment

12 Jay - The Phoenix Real Estate Guy February 15, 2009 at 9:39 pm

Dave – There doesn’t appear to be any down payment requirements in the bill. There was an amendment proposed last week to make a 5% down required, but it never made it into the final bill.

I’ve got link to the bill in this post:

http://www.phoenixrealestateguy.com/house-passes-stimulus-bill-all-1091-pages-of-it/1919

Be warned, it’s almost 1100 pages and you will want to poke a stick in your eye at about page 3.

The home buyer tax credit portion is in Part 2.

Reply to this comment

13 Wenningstedt February 15, 2009 at 11:32 pm

At least there’s hope in this still “blurred” economy. The stimulus bill with its new name somehow foretell that the future is still very bright if only cooperation is in the forefront. I know the IRS are not that low-minded persons to “grab” anybody that may “get their way”. We need understanding and sympathy to achieve what everyone is aiming for.

Reply to this comment

14 Tim Epps - Tulsa's Mortgage Lender February 16, 2009 at 11:42 am

Jay,
Your chart is well prepared and easy to understand – a great quick reference. Acknowledging that we are not CPAs, I would recommend one change.
With regards to the recapture provision, there was (and apparently still is?) forgiveness of the recapture amount that exceeds any net profit on the sale of the subject property.
For example, Joe & Helen buy their first home for $150,000. They sell it 2 years later for $160,000 but only netting them around $150,000 after their share of closing costs, commissions, etc. Since recapture does not start until the second year after the claim, they would not yet have begun repayment. But, since they had a net $0 profit, their repayment is forgiven.
I bring this up because many first-time home buyers are nervous and have expressed fear at coming up with this amount if they should have to sell early. Other forgiveness provisions are built in (death of spouse, etc.) as are other accelerators of the recapture, but I believe this example is worthy of note.
Thanks.

**Tim Epps´s last blog post..WSJ – For Some, It’s Finally Time to Dive Into Housing Market

Reply to this comment

15 Ryan@Bellingham Homes February 16, 2009 at 11:49 am

I think the Senate took a big swing by going for the $15,000 tax credit and open to anybody. Sometimes you have to ask for the world to get what you want. I think there is little doubt that this will help encourage first time home buyers. I am just hoping that those sales trickle upward into the move-up home market.

**Ryan´s last blog post..Scotty Browns in Bellingham WA – 3101 Newmarket Street Suite 201

Reply to this comment

16 Tim Johnson February 17, 2009 at 7:29 am

After reading all sorts of commentary on this incentive, I’m struck that we might just be exchanging one form of market-distorting conditions that drove up home prices in the first price (easy credit, non-due diligence by lenders) for another (government payments to help abate the drop in home values). It just seems it will only delay the inevitable continued downward spiral in prices.

Reply to this comment

17 Jim Whatley February 17, 2009 at 3:27 pm

As Usual Jay, great information. This might be the only thing that help the rule followers.

Reply to this comment

18 LeAnna February 18, 2009 at 7:38 am

I shouldn’t complain, I suppose, as I was buying my house last summer way before I knew about any “credit.” I found out about it like three days before closing. I took it, and I’m glad I did. It’s quite simple, you just have to list your parcel number, what you bought it for, all of that’s public information found on your city’s website. But I’m a little pissed that if I had waited six months, it would be $500 more, and I wouldn’t have to pay it back. $8,000 landing in my lap, no strings attached. That’s a third of my annual pay!

How does that make any sense? Do you think they might retroactively change the 2008 stimulus measure to align more with the 2009 one? *sigh*

Reply to this comment

19 Jay - The Phoenix Real Estate Guy February 19, 2009 at 5:55 am

LeAnna – I haven’t heard of any considerations for making the new $8,000 retroactive. The effective date is Jan 1, 2009. Imagine how those that bought on December 31 feel, or the people that bought in April 2008 before the $7500 loan was available — they get nothing. I guess they have to draw the line somewhere, and there will be people on the wrong side of that line no matter where it’s drawn.

Reply to this comment

20 Charles@Las Vegas Real Estate February 24, 2009 at 7:33 pm

Getting a fairly large tax credit (for most people) can do nothing but help. Personally I have a friend who is going to claim the credit on his 2008 return and use the money on new flooring and furnishing for his house…which is probably what they hoped for when they put it in the bill.

Reply to this comment

21 cashflowCindy March 2, 2009 at 2:11 pm

I am going to contact two of my rent to own families. Find out if they are familiar with this program to assist them with their down payment.

Reply to this comment

22 Sackville Real Estate March 22, 2009 at 1:29 pm

They just rolled out a similar program here in Canada. I hope that this will get people buying again. We have been having a ton of showings but we haven’t been getting anything on paper. With today’s low interest rates and this incentive people should start buying right away. At least we can hope this helps.

Reply to this comment

23 Dale Corbett March 23, 2009 at 1:07 pm

Great post! Really informative.

Thanks,

Dale Corbett
Frisco Homes

Reply to this comment

24 real estate in panama May 16, 2009 at 11:09 am

The tax credit is for first time home buyers only. DON’T RULE YOURSELF OUT if you have previously owned a home. The law defines a first time buyer as one who has not owned a principal residence in the previous 3 years-a rental home or vacation home will not exclude you from this tax credit.

Regards, Shane, Guy into real estate in panama

Reply to this comment

25 Edmund@Home Options Trading June 9, 2009 at 10:17 pm

Very detail information. Thanks.

Reply to this comment

26 cashflow Cindy June 10, 2009 at 5:02 am

I didn’t realize this was 10% of purchase price. If I wholesale a house for $50,000 then the first time homebuyer is eligible for $5K of the stimulus.

Reply to this comment

27 Toronto homes June 12, 2009 at 2:50 pm

Seems that you have done a great gob here to let people be aware of this first-time homebuyer tax credit. It is very detailed but needs to be revised cause people could be misdirected.

Reply to this comment

28 Jay Thompson June 12, 2009 at 3:25 pm

Toronto – what do feel needs to be revised? This post contains all the current info on the first time homebuyer tax credit. If I’ve missed something, please let me know as the last thing I want to do is misdirect anyone.

Reply to this comment

29 Edmund@Seo Singapore June 21, 2009 at 1:13 am

It seems that despite the bailout, only the banks are the beneficiaries and not the people.

Reply to this comment

30 James@Arthritis June 22, 2009 at 7:27 pm

There’s only a difference of $500 from $7500 to $8000 and it’s hardly significant.

Reply to this comment

31 Myles June 30, 2009 at 9:57 am

So if I have a cosigner on the home and the cosigner has owned a home. Does that rule me out for the tax credit? I have not owned a home before.

Reply to this comment

32 Tim Epps June 30, 2009 at 10:16 am

Myles,
As long as this is your primary residence and the cosignor is on the note only and not on title, you should be able to receive the credit. If the cosignor is a spouse, you will not if they have owned a home in the last 3 years. This credit is not related to how you finance the purchase – only to the manner in which title is held.
Of course, with any tax related question, please consult your tax advisor. Some sample scenarios are also on the IRS website at http://www.irs.gov/newsroom/article/0,,id=206294,00.html . Your situation may be very close to scenario S2.
Good luck with your purchase!
Tim

**Tim Epps´s last blog post..$8000 First Time Home Buyer Tax Credit for FHA Down Payment? NO (and maybe)

Reply to this comment

33 Bravo@Affordable Health Insurance Plans July 5, 2009 at 11:19 am

The home buyer credit is nice, and i know people personally who only is buying a home because the program exist. Between this and that cash for clunkers program, there should be alot of spending going on…lol.

Reply to this comment

34 Daneil McCain@Dubai Property July 7, 2009 at 10:59 pm

The tax payer money need to be spent on the well being of common American and should not be wasted to bail out the institutions responsible for the present economic crisis. I hope that the bill will help to protect the interest of a common American.

Reply to this comment

35 Real Estate Marketing July 11, 2009 at 1:21 am

Many realtors and business establishment were engaged in financial issues, they tend to get big loans in order for their business to survive in this time of depression.

Reply to this comment

36 Real Estate Marketing July 11, 2009 at 1:21 am

Many realtors and business establishment were engaged in financial issues, they tend to get big loans in order for their business to survive in this time of depression.

Reply to this comment

37 Real Estate Marketing July 11, 2009 at 3:21 am

Many realtors and business establishment were engaged in financial issues, they tend to get big loans in order for their business to survive in this time of depression.

Reply to this comment

38 Mark Oudekerk December 9, 2009 at 9:42 pm

i guess this is better late than never, but……

If I bought a house in October ‘08 and now can sell the house for more than we bought it for, does the government (read IRS) allow commissions, concessions to be paid out before the government recaptures any of the money ($7,500) we borrowed? Or does the government recapture the $7,500 first?

Reply to this comment

39 Jay Thompson December 10, 2009 at 11:30 pm

Mark – I’d be stepping WAY out of my area of expertise if I answered this question. I’ve never read about the IRS allowing for commissions / closing costs to be taken off the top before calculating re-capture, but your question wold be best proposed to a tax professional.

Reply to this comment

Leave a Comment

Read this blog's Comment Policy

CommentLuv Enabled

Previous post: Half of Arizona Homeowners are Underwater. 23% Nationwide…

Next post: Happy Thanksgiving from Phoenix Real Estate Guy!