Realtor Party Political Survival Initiative: How the NAR can help

.

Realtor-party-logoYesterday’s post on the NAR’s proposed Realtor Party Political Survival Initiative (RPPSI) has generated a fantastic conversation in the comments. Several other Realtors across the country have also penned articles expressing their opinions (see list at the bottom of this post).

In reading these articles, the comments, and the Twitter stream, it has become readily apparent that there is a lot of confusion surrounding this initiative. That is understandable since it’s complicated, polarizing, emotional and there is a looming voting deadline.

People need to understand this thing. I think most agents (if they are even aware of it) want to understand it.

Here is what I would do if I were at NAR

If you believe educating the NAR membership is important, then it is imperative that the NAR and local / state associations make effort to do just that – educate the membership. If I were steering the ship at NAR (and clearly I am not) here are a few things I would consider:

  • Put a big giant red button front and center on Realtor.org that links to the information page. Put this page and every page it links to outside of the member login firewall. There is no reason this information should require a log in to be viewed. Sure people can just log in to read it, but the simple fact is, the more steps you require someone to take to see something on the internet, the fewer number of people will actually take those steps.  Make it simple, and more people will read the material.
  • Right now, I see nothing on the home page of Realtor.org that says anything about the Realtor Party Political Survival Initiative.

    Here’s how I found it: Go to Realtor.org –> Click on the “Association Executives” link. (Stop. How many agents have ever clicked on that link?) –> Click on “Read More” under “NAR Announces Political Survival Initiative” –> log in –> start reading. (Stop. The first thing on this page says, “For AEs”. Where is the “For Agents” page??? Again, many agents will see “For AEs” and think, “Well, this isn’t for me” and they will read no further.)

  • Better yet, build a dedicated site for the RPPSI and link the giant red button on Realtor.org to that.
  • There is a lot of confusion surrounding this initiative and how it does/does not relate to RPAC. Write a document that clearly defines the purpose of RPPSI and RPAC, and that clearly delineates the differences between them.
  • The “Executive Summary” from the NAR Presidential Advisory Group on Political Survival is a great document – but it is 14 pages of single-spaced text. This is hardly a “summary”. Someone needs to summarize this summary into a 1 – 2 page concise overview that people will actually read. Yes, I’ve also read the “talking points” but those don’t seem to really cover the info in the executive summary.  Also, the title “Executive Summary” implies that somewhere there exists an even more in-depth document. Where is that document?
  • The #RPPSI hashtag for Twitter is a good idea. But how many members are actually on Twitter, and how many of those that are know how to follow a hashtag stream? Put a widget for the hashtag on Realtor.org (or the dedicated RRPSI site).  This would allow non-Twitter users to see what is happening there.
  • Build a repository of articles members are publishing about this initiative. A simple “Read what members are saying” list of links in a central location would prove beneficial. Don’t be afraid to post “opposing” views, as well as “pro” views.
  • Write a blog post on one of NAR’s numerous blogs with a brief overview of the initiative and encourage members to leave their opinions in comments. Don’t hold these comments in moderation (as is typically done on NAR blogs) as that stifles the flow of conversation and discourages people from commenting.
  • The slides that were presented at AEI contain good information. But slides without the voice behind the presentation leaves huge potential for misinterpretation. Post a video of the presentation, or at least a transcript. If no video exists, have whoever presented this at AEI (and there is zero indication on the site of who that was) re-create it on video. UPDATE: The slides have been edited since I looked yesterday to add a transcript. I still have no clue who gave this presentation, and the slide deck + transcript is now 31 pages long. Make a video.)
  • Include Board of Director’s email and phone numbers on the BoD roster. Members should be encouraged to contact their Directors to express their opinions. Establishing  contact with Director’s could go a long way toward “selling” this initiative to the membership. It’s mind-boggling to me that I would have to spend almost two hours trying to Google my states 31 Directors in an attempt to find contact info for them – and I can’t find it for some. If a Director doesn’t want their contact info published so they can be contacted by their “constituents”, well, then they shouldn’t be a Director.
  • There is a Political Survival Initiative: Building the REALTOR® Party session scheduled for Midyear at 3:30 – 4:30 on May 11. It may prove beneficial to schedule a second session in case someone has a conflict and can not attend the May 11 session. If this session is truly “interactive” as it is being billed, one hour doesn’t seem long enough.
  • Invite Rob Hahn to moderate a panel session on RPPSI at Midyear. Include on the panel people that both support and oppose the initiative.
  • Send NAR representatives to Real Estate Bar Camps, YPN, WCR and related events, and to host live “town halls” in multiple locations. Putting a person and a face to the initiative makes it far easier to sell members on the benefits than does publishing reams of “paper” and information.
  • Respond to the blog posts, tweets and other “publications” that are already out there, with more certainly to come. There are some fantastic conversations happening in blog post comments. I’ve had comments from Association CEOs, State and Association Presidents, BoD members and the member rank and file all making very salient points about this initiative.  I’ve seen the same on other blog posts. I’ve yet to see anything from the NAR, other than the occasional tweet asking people to provide input. The NAR itself should join in on the conversation…

That’s a lot of stuff. And there is less than two months before this initiative comes up for a Board of Directors vote on May 14. Obviously not all of this can be done before then, but communication of this initiative is crucial. Please don’t leave that communication to some electronic material stuffed behind a members only firewall, and please don’t assume that most of your one million members will read the occasional blog post and Tweet. It’s imperative for many reasons that this topic be openly discussed and considered by as many members as possible.

It’s not the $40 (though it will be just that to many members). It is the principles behind this, and the apparent shift in the purpose and scope of the NAR, that is important for people to understand. The NAR feels they need this, therefore they need membership support. To get that, it is past time to crank up the communication machine.

Others Opine. Posts about the REALTOR® Party Political Survival Initiative:

Rob Hahn: BREAKING: NAR Launches a Political Party, Risks Its Future
Inman News: NAR floats $40 dues hike for political campaigns
Monika McGillicuddy: The REALTOR® Party Political Survival Initiative
Gene Wunderlich (Active Rain): NAR Realtor Party Political Survival Initiative – A Penny For Your Thoughts.
Matt Fuller: National Association of Realtors Political Survival Initiative?
South Carolina Realtors Association: Open Letter – REALTOR® Political Survival Initiative
Agent Genius: NAR dues going up 50 percent for proposed Political Survival Initiative – Breaking News
Cherokee Association of Realtors: The REALTOR Party Political Survival Initiative
Mike Long: Thoughts on NAR’s Realtor® Party Political Survival Initiative
Kathy Howe: How is NAR’s membership responding to NAR’s Political Party?
Real Estate Industry Watch: NAR plans $40 mandatory political fund fee increase
Steve Hoffacker: Must Read For All Realtors – You Are Being Played By NAR
PA Association of Realtors: NAR announces dues increase for political advocacy
Dulles Area Association of Realtors: REALTOR® PARTY POLITICAL SURVIVAL INITIATIVE AND THE COST TO YOU
Chicago Agent Magazine: NAR to Raise Membership Dues
Russell Shaw (Agent Genius): NAR raises dues, will membership numbers really drop?
J. Phillip Faranda: Why I Will Happily Shell Out the 40 Bucks
Teri Lussier (Bloodhound Blog): It’s the REALTOR Party, you can cry if you want to…
NAR Realtor Action Center: The REALTOR® Party Political Survival Initiative: Let Us Hear From You
Rob Hahn: This Way Lies Victory: Fixing NAR’s Political Survival Initiative

If you know of other posts, let me know and I’ll put them in the list.

Like, Tweet, share...

.

 

Other things you can do...

Search for Homes
Email Updates
RSS

About the Author
Jay Thompson

I'm a real estate broker in Phoenix, Arizona and the publisher of the Phoenix Real Estate Guy blog. I tend to drive too fast and scream at the University of Texas and Denver Broncos football teams. My two kids are smarter than most adults I know and my wife is simply amazing.

The Phoenix Real Estate Guy runs on AgentPress

AgentPress is a specialized WordPress theme for real estate agents and brokers, powered by the industry standard Genesis Framework. With AgentPress on your team, you're empowered to get the most out of WordPress for online marketing.

Genesis provides the secure and search-engine-optimized foundation that powers any successful website. And AgentPress provides the specific listing and lead-generation functionality real estate pros need to succeed.

Find out more about AgentPress here.

Comments

We always appreciate your comments! Phoenix Real Estate Guy uses two commenting systems, Facebook and LiveFyre. LiveFyre is the most robust system (and easy to use!). It allows you to login with Twitter, Facebook, Google+ LinkedIn, OpenId, LiveFyre and as a "Guest". I recommend getting a LiveFyre account, it has some great features (just click the LiveFyre button when you write your comment).

 

BLOG COMMENT POLICY: We respectfully ask that you use your real name (first name only is fine) and not use keywords (Why no keywords?). The only real "comment rules" are be civil -- no personal attacks -- and no advertising. (See the full comment policy here). Opinion and debate are welcome, but attack the idea, not the person.

 

LiveFyre Comments

Comments have been disabled for this post.
Sort: Newest | Oldest

NAR does a poor job of disseminating current data to it's members. Especially to smaller communities like Prescott Arizona. Like you pointed out Jay, navigating the Realtor.org site and "hunting" for the info can take some time, and not so easy for the less "tech savvy-agents".
I like your suggestion of a "BIG Red Button" that links to the information.
I also agree with Matt Stigliano; " a vote for Jay for a BOARD position." :)

I vote for Jay for a position on the Board of Directors.

(Last time you jumped into the fray, re: Google is a scraper, it worked. Why not?)

Dude. Don't even think that... ;)

I'm kind of late reading this blog but its a great one. I was nodding while I was reading this. And I love your suggestions.

I'll add my post/email to the discussion. It brings up a lot of questions and I'm certainly not saying I have the answers, but I'm with the "it's not the $40" side of the thinking.

NAR’s Political Survival Initiative: A Letter to SABOR

All great comments and I thank Jay for his great post. I've been burning up the Internet with my complete and full opposition to this initiative since Rob Hahn's blog nd I am tired! But the fight continues. BTW, it took me an hour to find an email address for Ron Phipps yesterday - and I never found it at Realtor.org; I could only find his personal real estate company email! Ridiculously hard to reach. He heard from me (if found email address is legit). NAR has to explain how this isn't an Article 1 violation: "treat all parties fairly." I am in my third year on Grievance and Article 1 applies here (in my experience); not just when we're in a deal together. I'm with you all. Sign me: Hot and bothered and on the warpath.

Great post Jay, these are fabulous suggestions!

Poor timing, poor way of releasing the hike, but at the end of the day, I think I'm pretty okay with the increase. I've heard a lot of sabre rattling over it all, but let's be honest: As Realtors we complain about low standards, we complain about public perception, we complain about pretty much everything and the cost of NAR dues is exceptionally low. let's think about NAR's concern here for a moment. Our industry is at risk because of fundamental shifts being proposed by national government reps, including the elimination of home owner tax credits, elimination of Fannie/Freddie, etc. If NAR feels the need to spend more money lobbying to protect that then by god,they have my support!

You're just starting to see that the NAR is out of touch? They've always been out of touch. The latest issue of the magazine headlined how to pick a camera, and the one before that talked about smart phones. They don't get it. Also they're talking to a membership base that's equally out of touch...not the professional side.

Maybe they'll update their "code of ethics" to add a "we do what we feel like doing" clause

I agree with John Wake - we are now a union and I don't think NAR really cares what we think and will do what they want to anyway. We'll get a little bone thrown our way: they will say "we're listening" and give us a place to comment, etc. But in the end: it's the NEW NAR UNION.

This is a HUGE power grab by NAR lobbyists and management.

My bet is that NAR intentionally tried to minimize communication about the Realtor Party and their only communication problem now is only that Realtors are communicating among themselves about it.

Agreed, Joe.

... we’ve crossed the line from a trade association into a union

Agree, Joe.

... we’ve crossed the line from a trade association into a union

Fantastic post and suggestions, Jay. This issue is so subjective, depending on who's opining; but what it has raised the most is the need for clear-cut, straight-line, transparent communications top-down. We all "win" if that happens.

Thanks for the incluclusion, JT.

Lori Bee asks if all of this should be public.

Yes, Lori. Hugs to you, girl! You know I think you are awesome.

Reason why NAR should allow it on the public side? If NAR is going to take this path, it will affect the consumer, not just the REALTOR-member. Maybe it is time for NAR to consider the end-user in its thinking. We licensees have to justify the things NAR does and frankly, through the years, it has not always been easy...remember the DOJ suing NAR? #Justsayin

NAR does represent membership. Why else do we not have a #1 search site? Because membership is afraid of market-share among other things. But, NAR also touts to membership that they represent "private property rights".

Thanks, Lori, for all you do.

JT... great post.

Our board exceeded its RPAC goals this year. Many boards do. The RPAC donations are a value statement of what each member sees from RPAC .Talk about letting the agents vote with their wallets, that is what RPAC donations do.. I do not support climbing on the "buy your candidate" position toward which this new campaign seems to be headed. I.e., that because the law allows no limits on campaign donations, we need to raise our efforts, spend more and expand our political club/power.
If the concept is properly explained and the agents are well informed those who can wil donate for the right issues. Up until now the system as worked.

I am opposed to the $40. 'TAX'.

Great post. Great suggestions. I am in Leadership and still digesting all the info myself. Thanks for making it easier for me to find. Flabbergasted at the costs to run things on page 11, but also appreciative of the "breakdown" on page 25 of the slides. I definitely encourage REALTORS to make the effort to log in and check it out.

But I'm not sure about making everything public Jay. Do we really need to broadcast all the details to everyone in other industries about what our game plan actually is? When I play sports, I don't ever give the opposing team my playbook. ;)

Love your suggestions, and completely agree about the $40. It really is more about principle. I support RPAC and truly appreciate all it does. I'm still catching up with a lot of reading, but not super thrilled about this idea, so far.

As a board member of my local MLS I know that a great deal of thought must have gone into this (I hope) but I am with you that the PR of the whole thing is poor. I am choosing my poison on the matter, but you make a huge point about how they've executed things thus far.

It all boils down to proper communication doesn't it? Jay, I think you should run for President, just think, we would really know what's going on in this country. You laid out a perfect guideline for all businesses to follow when making a change and all I can say is Kudos. Thanks for contributing to the professionalism and transparency of our Association and industry. :-)

If only this world were so perfect!

Jay, I will be happy to provide you with all of the blog posts we have found. *ALL* of the information we gather online is being wrapped into daily reports that are being sent to NAR's leadership. We have to know what questions are being asked before we know what answers to provide. So for the first couple days, we've been concentrating on listening.

You made valid points about the information on realtor.org in your last post and we have been working since then to address them. We'll have more information for our members very soon.

Thanks Todd! I've added the posts you provided to my list above.

Listening first makes sense. Kind of hard to respond to questions if you don't know what the questions are....

As I mentioned in my previous post on this, I know the folks at NAR are good peeps. And that they have the members interests in mind. There's no doubt in my mind about that. They just need to communicate, and there isn't much time to do that. (Yeah, I know that you know that too)

I also should have put "local and state associations" in this post title. They too are instrumental in getting the word out about this initiative.

Hey Todd,

NAR needs to get some information out to their membership in addition to their leadership.

Like Jay said, it's been pretty tough to find accurate information about this push even if you're looking for it.

Thank you Jay, Great Suggestions and as always very well written. I will be sharing this at a local level!

Yes it really sucked the way that I read about it on three other sites before I found anything written by the NAR. I really hate reading opinion before I can read facts and form my own opinion

Jay,
Our local board here in Temecula used to push the CAR PAC contribution pretty heavily, for good reason. However, last year they made the $49 a mandatory "contribution." Now we're talking about another $40 per year. Yes I agree that we're getting a lot of bang for our buck but now we've crossed the line from a trade association into a union. The "value proposition" everyone is talking about is "give us the money and we'll control to what, or whom, it is given"...that's the part that concerns me.
I'm not heavily active in Association activities...just don't have the time...but I really do agree that they stop some really stupid legislation here in California so this is needed. I agree with you most on the point about not giving a penny to any candidate.
Thanks for bringing this to my attention...had no idea it was going on.
Joe

Does the NAR have a "Communications Director" position? If not, you should apply. If so, they should read this post.

Great suggestions Jay, as always!

Facebook Comments

 

More in Real Estate (52 of 511 articles)

The ARMLS logo indicates a property listed by a real estate brokerage other than Thompson's Realty.
All information should be verified by the recipient and none is guaranteed as accurate by ARMLS.

Copyright 2012 Arizona Regional Multiple Listing Service, Inc. All rights reserved.

Data last updated 5/22/12 10:51 AM PDT.

This IDX solution is (c) Diverse Solutions 2012.