The NAR and DOJ Come to Terms. Yawn.

Back in 2005, the Department of Justice (DOJ) filed suit against the National Association of Realtors (NAR).

The two have apparently slugged it out long enough to reach a settlement.

No real point in rehashing it all. To be honest, it’s really quite a snoozer — and basically meaningless in today’s world. VOWs (Virtual Office Website — the subject of much of the contention) are all but dead. IDX’s (the type of “MLS Search” you can do on most real estate sites, including this blog) aren’t affected from what I can tell in my first cut through the releases.

I would be curious to know just how many tax dollars (and NAR dues dollars) were spent on this nonsense…

On second thought, I’d probably rather not know….

If you are interested in the specifics:

Here is the proposed final judgment in its entirety.

Michael Wurzer has a fabulous first-pass take on the FBS blog. As an “insider” on how MLS’s live and breathe, his opinion is (in my opinion) the one most worth listening to.

Some great comments (for the most part) on the Agent Genius post.

The NAR of course, has their spin.

As does the DOJ.

And if you believe the spin, befitting of two bloated bureaucracies, both sides “won”.

Whatever. I don’t see how it’s going to really effect my business, or real estate in general. I don’t run a VOW (and honestly, can’t understand why anyone would). I’ve been able to freely compete on costs, as has everyone else in my market that I’m aware of. Consumers have a wide variety of choices when it comes to real estate services — from flat fee, MLS only houses to “full service” brokerages and everything in between.

Apparently the DOJ enjoys nosing around in private industry and free enterprise, spending boatloads of taxpayer dollars. Now that they should have more free time on their hands, maybe they can mount a frontal assault on the oil companies. When was the last time you saw competition in gas prices? The only competition there seems to be in the race for who can raise their prices fastest.

Others Opine:
Jonathan Dalton
Sellsius
Bloodhound
Inman Blog
Redfin

Email This Post

Print This Post

Thanks for reading! We value your thoughts and opinions, so please feel free to leave a comment. Please contact us if you have any questions or need help. You can also get automatic updates for this blog free via:

Potentially Related Posts on Phoenix Real Estate Guy:

The Phoenix Real Estate Guy — #5 on Google

What do all these terms in the Multiple Listing Service (MLS) mean? Sale pending, AWC, TOM, DOM, etc?

Strange Search Term of the Week

Read this blog's Comment Policy

Bill Lublin

Jay: The fact that it doesn't impact you shows that NAR won for US - and I agree that it makes me nuts that you and I got to pay both ends of the lawsuit - I feel like a split personality suing itself for alienation of affection ;-)

Las Vegas High Rise Guy

I don't want to know how much money was spent. Sometimes it's better if you don't know.

Michael Wurzer

Thanks for the link and comment, Jay! I think you're right that the settlement is unlikely to impact your business, though I do think you'll see some further innovation around IDX sites in the near future following the new policies. Though you can do much of what's necessary already, the rules of the game just got clarified quite a bit for what can happen once a client registers.

Gregory Bain

Jay, it's in the fine print. We no longer are required to pay dues to the National, State, and Local Association of Realtors. Ya gotta read the fine print. zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

John Lockwood

Hi Jay,

Thanks for providing this. Even if it's a sleeper, it's nice to have the information at hand, so I added it to RealEstateVoices.com.